|
There are no translations available.
Household Chemicals
Help or Hurt?
This home & garden product manufacturer wanted to simplify the decision process at the point of sale.
What
| The Data |
|
Time in Section
|
1:30 minutes
|
Time Reading Packages
|
30 seconds
|
| Percentage Who did Not Know what Product They Needed |
43% |
| Percentage Who Felt Shopping was Confusing |
27% |
| Percentage Who did Not Make a Purchase |
25% |
So What
This category is confusing. Low frequency of shopping, unfamiliarity with the product, lack of previous experience, missing section or product information, and low assistance rates were some of the factors that made shopping complicated and difficult.
Shopper behavior was identified as such: Orient > Scan > Search General > Search Product Specific > Investigate > Decide
Shoppers who were uncertain about “where to begin” first tried to discern the display as a whole. The current fixture did not incorporate overall “start here” signage well.
The current planogram was designed to be shopped from top to bottom. Because we scan from left to right, the current planogram was not helpful.
In this case, the package is shopped rather than the actual product. In general, shoppers rely on the package (manufacturer) and the shelf (retailer + manufacturer) for information about the product. Here, there was little harmony between the product and its shelf/category layout.
What Next
By rethinking the planogram in terms of how the category is shopped, products and messages will display a clearer “tutorial” sense, confusion will lessen, and confidence and purchasing will increase.
Click here to download Case Study.
Supermarket Category A
Climbing the Decision Tree
This household CPG manufacturer wanted to learn what factors influenced shoppers at the point of sale and drove their purchased decisions.
What
| The Data |
|
Percentage of Customers with no Brand in Mind
|
56% |
Client’s Brand Shopping Share
|
63% |
Client’s Brand Conversion Rate Ratio
|
77% |
Time Spent at Shelf
|
44 seconds
|
| Top Two Product Attributes Hierarchy in Order |
Size, Price
|
So What
Although invested in this category, shoppers were not brand-loyal; there was considerable decision making and education at the shelf.
Length of shopping time indicates consumers needed time to examine product attributes to ensure correct purchase. Also, Shop-Along interview responses revealed that more information was needed at the shelf and on the package.
What Next
As the category leader, the client’s brand should play up its color and name by building a stronger visual “brand block” at the shelf to cement its lead (versus a win by default).
Merchandising and packaging should clearly call out product features to assist customer info-fueling.
Click here to download Case Study.
Supermarket Category B
Get Me Outta Here!
This household CPG manufacturer wanted to learn who its shopper is and how its products are shopped at the shelf.
What
Store Info
|
Category Info:
|
Overall Time in Supermarket
|
24 Minutes
|
Actual Time Spent Shopping
|
15 Minutes
|
| Trend: More Frequent Visits, Buying Fewer Items Per Visit |
|
|
|
Category Info:
|
|
Time Spent Shopping Shelf
|
22 Seconds
|
Conversion Ratio
|
93% |
Client's Brand Had Low Client Shopper Share
|
|
So What
These were mission shoppers, shopping quickly with low involvement (Grab & Go). Shoppers were price-sensitive and the client’s brand lost share to lower-priced store brands.
Shoppers were irritated because of the difficulty distinguishing between brand and product type. They knew what they wanted but couldn’t quickly identify it at the shelf.
What Next
These mission shoppers want a clearer approach. This was not a “fun” product to shop. After focusing on brand color and name, eliminate extraneous package information or relegate some to package sides, back, or bottom. Rethink the overall packaging to distinguish from similar looking generic brands. Make this an easier item to shop.
Click here to download Case Study.
|